Add your location to a Google Map One must question everything in life your or hair, the way you , the way you , the way you , what you , how you everything must be questioned to find out, so that the becomes extraordinarily , . It is only the highly sensitive mind and that is intelligent, and such a mind alone can . Such a mind alone is a mind.
Testing out my butt plugs! Didnt want this to be too long so only showing the biggest one but it took a long time to get there!
No, and I never will.
See, my original images are renderings from extremely obscure 3-D virtual worlds. First of all, I have very good reasons to write my image descriptions that long see here:
Besides, how is someone supposed to
accurately describe my images who has never even heard of the underlying technology of these worlds, much less the specific places which my images show, not to mention the contents of the images
See, in my long descriptions, I also give all necessary explanations so people neither have to look up anything themselves nor ask me anything to understand the images and the descriptions. For example, I don't simply mention where an image was made. I explain it, and I explain it at multiple levels (explanations of explanations etc.) because the topic at hand is so obscure.
People who know nothing about the images can't give any explanations
because they know nothing about the images.
For example, tell me how you'd describe the object to the right of the avatar in this image: . Then we'll both laugh. And then I'll give you a copy of how I've actually explained and described it.
Lastly, other people would describe my images by looking at the images. I'm far ahead of that. I describe my images by going in-world and looking at the real deal. I can see vastly more details. I can and do transcribe text of which people who look at the image don't even know it's there because it's so tiny.
This also enables me to identify far more elements in the image than complete laypeople who only have an 800x533 image to look at. I can tell you, quote from an actual image description, "there are two identical aa palms in square terracotta pots with wide rims" while nobody else can even spot the plants in the first place, much less identify them.
# # # # # # # # # # # Not Hard
Two and a half years ago, I racked my brains on how to describe four images of nebulae within three images. In descriptions that'd end up almost 40,000 characters, over 25,000 characters and almost 10,000 characters long respectively. I almost decided against posting these images because I felt incapable of describing these details appropriately.
I still think these detail descriptions are far away from being as good as they could possibly be, also because there's another image in the image which I've described in almost 4,700 characters.
It took me two days to research for and write these descriptions, one day for the first image, the other day for the other two.
Link to the post in question (caution, the image descriptions are extremely outdated by my current standards):
In all seriousness, I've rendered images that I intended to post, and I ended up not posting them because I couldn't realistically describe them. I've even refrained from making images of other scenes, simply because there was no way I could possibly describe them appropriately.
Not Hard. LOL.
Oh, and by the way: I'm working on a wiki about alt-texts and image descriptions with a special focus on the Fediverse. I expect it to have some 50 pages or more, and I have more than 50 references for the wiki now. Here's the link to the wiki:
Not Hard.
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Literally doesn't work for me.
I put a huge effort into describing my original images
twice each. My alt-texts must be among the longest in the Fediverse, and those are the
short descriptions. The long descriptions in the posts themselves regularly exceed every last pre-defined character limit in the Fediverse by magnitudes.
Reactions: none. Especially no repeats (that's how we call boosts over here). At least not for my original image posts and very rarely for my meme posts.
Examples of original image posts (even though they may not have originated on Mastodon, they're still in the Fediverse, and they've shown up on Mastodon users' timelines):
(post hidden behind summary/CW, images hidden behind spoiler tag)
Not on mstdn.social.- Alt-text for the first image: 1,500 characters, including 990 characters of visual description.
- Alt-text for the second image: 1,497 characters, including 987 characters of visual description.
- Long description in the post text: 20,377 characters, combined for both images.
Took 8 hours to research for and write. - 100% self-researched and hand-written, 0% AI content.
- Zero "boosts".
- Zero "faves".
(post hidden behind summary/CW)
- On Mastodon: , at the very bottom.
- Alt-text for the image: 1,500 characters, including 1,402 characters of visual description. I had to shorten the instructions how to find the long description.
- Long description in the post text: 60,553 characters.
Took two full days to research for and write.
It's actually deliberately limited in comparison with prior image descriptions. - 100% self-researched and hand-written, 0% AI content.
- Zero "boosts".
- Zero "faves".
(post hidden behind summary/CW)
- On Mastodon: , second post from the top.
- Alt-text for the image: 920 characters, including 382 characters of visual description.
- 100% self-researched and hand-written, 0% AI content.
- Long description in the post text: 25,420 characters.
It's actually lacking detail. - Zero "boosts".
- Three "faves" for the record.
I haven't posted any new original images in 2025 and none in this year either because the descriptions for a series of images I've made in 2024 aren't done yet. But I've got my doubts that anything will change in this regard.
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
Le nombre denfants a explos et un nombre significatif dentre eux taient dtenus depuis plus de 100 jours, souligne , conseillre juridique en chef de .Sources : ,
On we follow
Man walking up the long, steep mountain trail.It was a fantastic hike today with amazing clouds!
Long train in California desert
Un bilan probablement sous-estim, prcise qui sappuie sur les tmoignages de 21 ex-dtenues. titre de comparaison, 237 prisonniers sont morts entre 1967 et 2023.
dnonce une politique systmique et institutionnalise de mauvais traitements, dans un contexte de dtention administrative massive, sans accusation ni procs.
Au moins 84 sont mortes dans les prisons depuis le 7 octobre 2023, aprs avoir subi des mauvais traitements incluant violences physiques, sexuelles et psychologiques, privations de nourriture et refus de soins, selon .
Ce sont quelques cas extraits du dernier rapport de sur les violences subies par les otages . dtient 9 000 . La moiti d'entre eux sont emprisonns indfiniment sans inculpation ni procs.
Non ci ritireremo nellombra -Haul