Find the latitude of any place.  

: Ancien commissaire au March intrieur,

: Ancien commissaire au March intrieur, figure cl des rglements sur le numrique (DSA, DMA). et : Co-directrices de .

It doesn't fit the timelines in the official Mastodon phone app. Which has the only Fediverse user interface out there that cannot fold longer posts in.
The Mastodon Web UI can do that. All third-party Mastodon apps can do that. The Web UIs of just about the whole rest of the Fediverse from Pleroma and Misskey to Friendica and Hubzilla can do that. Phone apps for stuff that isn't Mastodon can do that.
Only the haphazardly developed official Mastodon app can't do that because it's geared towards a Fediverse with only 500 characters, a Fediverse of a kind that has never existed.
Mastodon is not the reference implementation of the Fediverse. And the official Mastodon app is not the reference implementation of Mastodon apps, much less of Fediverse apps. It only exists for there to be something official named "Mastodon" in the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store.
Just because Mastodon tossed out a lack-lustre app in 2022 for those who absolutely need something named "Mastodon" on their phones to access the Fediverse, doesn't mean that Fediverse software that has existed for almost six years longer than Mastodon and twelve years longer than that app must adapt to the existence of that app and cut down its character limit from 16,777,215 to 500 for all those who can't use Mastodon through something with another name on it than "Mastodon".
By the way: Mastodon's way of cutting longer posts up into tiny chunks of no more than 500 characters goes onto the nerves of users of Pleroma, Akkoma, Misskey, Calckey, Firefish, Iceshrimp-JS, Iceshrimp.NET, Sharkey, CherryPick, GoToSocial, snac, Hollo, Socialhome, Friendica, Hubzilla, (streams), Forte and others. But they are not allowed to complain about that, much less tell Mastodon users who do that to move someplace that offers them more characters.
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Fifth class. All of them.
As I've said, everyone talks about Mastodon as "the" Twitter alternative in the Fediverse. This means that microblogging server apps that aren't Mastodon, and that don't have the same level of publicity and fame as GoToSocial and snac, are next to unknown by Mastodon's standards.
Mind you, this ranking is extremely Mastodon-centred. But Mastodon-centrism has been the default in the Fediverse for many years now.
# # # # # # # # # # # Fifth class. All of them.
As I've said, everyone talks about Mastodon as "the" Twitter alternative in the Fediverse. This means that microblogging server apps that aren't Mastodon, and that don't have the same level of publicity and fame as GoToSocial and snac, are next to unknown by Mastodon's standards.
Mind you, this ranking is extremely Mastodon-centred. But Mastodon-centrism has been the default in the Fediverse for many years now.
# # # # # # # # # # #We have a five-class Fediverse nowadays.
First class: Mastodon. It's what everyone knows (everyone outside of Lemmy at least). It's what more Mastodon users than not take for the one and only Fediverse and ActivityPub gold standard (while literally nobody outside of Mastodon does, go figure). And it's the only Fediverse server application which many Fedizens take for the entire Fediverse. (Lemmings don't refer to Lemmy as the Fediverse, although many are still completely unaware that Lemmy is connected to anything else.)
Second class: the stuff that looks like add-ons glued onto Mastodon to enhance Mastodon. Pixelfed, an Instagram clone glued to the Twitter clone as an add-on. PeerTube, a YouTube clone glued to the Twitter clone as an add-on. Loops, a TikTok clone glued to the Twitter clone as an add-on. WordPress, a blogging engine and content management system eventually glued to the Twitter clone. I guess you get the idea.
It's only up to the second class that Fediverse server software is generally recognised and accepted from the usual Mastodon-centric point of view.
Third class: other halfway well-known "clones" of or replacements for corporate online platforms that do not look like they're glued onto Mastodon as add-ons. This is limited to the Threadiverse (Lemmy, what's left of /kbin, Mbin, PieFed) as Reddit replacements and Friendica as "the" Facebook replacement.
Fourth class: anything that doesn't fall into the first three classes, but that has enough publicity. Like Bonfire and WriteFreely. Also, minimalist stuff for self-hosters like GoToSocial and snac. Hubzilla is ever so barely teetering on this class, if at all.
Basically, it's only up to the fourth class that Fediverse server software is known at all.
Finally, fifth class: the whole rest. I mean, why is Mastodon known as "the" Twitter alternative in the Fediverse if there are loads of others that are better, more powerful, sometimes even closer to Twitter in certain features Why is Friendica known as "the" Facebook alternative in the Fediverse if Friendica's own creator has built a whole family tree of successors that outclass Friendica in various ways
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #We have a five-class Fediverse nowadays.
First class: Mastodon. It's what everyone knows (everyone outside of Lemmy at least). It's what more Mastodon users than not take for the one and only Fediverse and ActivityPub gold standard (while literally nobody outside of Mastodon does, go figure). And it's the only Fediverse server application which many Fedizens take for the entire Fediverse. (Lemmings don't refer to Lemmy as the Fediverse, although many are still completely unaware that Lemmy is connected to anything else.)
Second class: the stuff that looks like add-ons glued onto Mastodon to enhance Mastodon. Pixelfed, an Instagram clone glued to the Twitter clone as an add-on. PeerTube, a YouTube clone glued to the Twitter clone as an add-on. Loops, a TikTok clone glued to the Twitter clone as an add-on. WordPress, a blogging engine and content management system eventually glued to the Twitter clone. I guess you get the idea.
It's only up to the second class that Fediverse server software is generally recognised and accepted from the usual Mastodon-centric point of view.
Third class: other halfway well-known "clones" of or replacements for corporate online platforms that do not look like they're glued onto Mastodon as add-ons. This is limited to the Threadiverse (Lemmy, what's left of /kbin, Mbin, PieFed) as Reddit replacements and Friendica as "the" Facebook replacement.
Fourth class: anything that doesn't fall into the first three classes, but that has enough publicity. Like Bonfire and WriteFreely. Also, minimalist stuff for self-hosters like GoToSocial and snac. Hubzilla is ever so barely teetering on this class, if at all.
Basically, it's only up to the fourth class that Fediverse server software is known at all.
Finally, fifth class: the whole rest. I mean, why is Mastodon known as "the" Twitter alternative in the Fediverse if there are loads of others that are better, more powerful, sometimes even closer to Twitter in certain features Why is Friendica known as "the" Facebook alternative in the Fediverse if Friendica's own creator has built a whole family tree of successors that outclass Friendica in various ways
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Flipboard nimmt vom Fediverse jenseits von Mastodon berhaupt keine Notiz. Fr die besteht das Fediverse nur aus Mastodon und Flipboard.
Dazu kommt erschwerend, da sie so corporate sind, da sie selbst etwas, was keinen CEO und keine Inc. hat, gar nicht als existent wahrnehmen.
Also tun sie, was die allermeisten Fediverse-Entwickler tun: Sie entwickeln nur gegen Mastodon. Nicht einfach gegen die Mastodon Client API, sondern auch gegen Mastodon-Interna und Mastodon-Spezifika.
Siehe vorher auch FediDevs, das sogar "Fedi" im Namen trgt, aber hart ausschlielich gegen Mastodon gebaut wurde, weil die Entwickler so lange der felsenfesten berzeugung waren, da das Fediverse nur das Mastodon-Netzwerk ist, bis es zu spt war. Weil das ganze Backend von FediDevs darauf ausgelegt ist, direkt gegen bestimmte Serversoftware gebaut zu werden statt gegen allgemeine Standards, mssen sie jetzt die Untersttzung fr jede einzelne Serveranwendung hndisch nachtrglich reinbauen.
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

His balls, his cock--his whole package--- is absolutely mouth watering!

hangers, cock, bush, face, chin, nose, nose = long cock, body, & pits, watering, as fuck

Eine beschreibt ein tragbares Gert zur Beurteilung von #Gebrechlichkeit, das in kleinen Invivo-Studien eine KI-Inferenz auf Gerten zu Gangbiosignalen mit hoher Rate durchfhrt und damit der GoldStandard-Gebrechlichkeitsdiagnostik entspricht, whrend es 10 Tage lang ohne Benutzerinteraktion kontinuierlich luft.

Eine zur kontinuierlichen berwachung der Vitalzeichen auf Station berichtet ber eine der ersten prospektiven Auswertungen automatisierter Warnungen in Krankenhausumgebungen, die auf eine frhere Erkennung einer Verschlechterung des Zustands des Patienten abzielen.

Neue legen nahe, dass passive, kontinuierliche Datenstrme die Erkennung von #LongCOVID-Phnotypen im Vergleich zur herkmmlichen Nachverfolgung allein verbessern knnen.

Irlanda, 1887 (Edwin , 1829-1891) coleccin privada Maestro de la pintura victoriana, especializado en historias y La mujer fue uno de sus temas pictricos favoritos

Whenever someone announces to "bring" something "to the Fediverse", chances are that Friendica has actually had it since 2010, for five and a half years longer than Mastodon has been around.
For example, just about everyone on Mastodon is fully convinced that Eugen Rochko has brought quote-posts to the Fediverse this year. That's because next to nobody on Mastodon knows that Friendica has been able to quote-post practically everything in the Fediverse, including Mastodon toots, for 15 years now.
And if Friendica doesn't have it, chances are still that Hubzilla has it, and that Hubzilla has probably had it for longer than Mastodon has been around, too.
For example, private messages that are actually private. Mastodon doesn't have them because the "privacy" of Mastodon DMs is only "guaranteed" by limiting whom a DM is sent to. Hubzilla does have them and has had them since 2012, since it was still named Red. How Because Hubzilla also limits who is permitted to see a DM.
Oh, and Hubzilla even offers optional encryption on top of that.
Or how about server-independent identity Everyone still waiting for Bluesky to finally be the pioneer who invents this and implements it for the first time LOL! Once again, Hubzilla has had this since 2012. Not a vague concept, not an unstable proof-of-concept, but daily-driven by production-grade channels on production-grade servers. (streams) has it, too, inherited from Hubzilla through a whole number of forks. Forte has it, too, and Forte is the first and, so far, only Fediverse server software that uses ActivityPub for nomadic identity.
Now I'm waiting for someone to announce that something will "bring" actual groups "to the Fediverse". A feature that was actually introduced to the Fediverse by StatusNet in 2008, and that's also available on Friendica, Hubzilla, (streams) and Forte. Not to mention that the very principle of the Threadiverse (Lemmy, the remains of /kbin, Mbin, PieFed) is based on groups.
This is what happens when you think that the feature set of the whole Fediverse is the feature set of Mastodon and maybe Pixelfed because that's all you know.
Speaking of Mastodon: Just because it's being "brought to the Fediverse", doesn't mean it'll be adopted by Mastodon.
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #Whenever someone announces to "bring" something "to the Fediverse", chances are that Friendica has actually had it since 2010, for five and a half years longer than Mastodon has been around.
For example, just about everyone on Mastodon is fully convinced that Eugen Rochko has brought quote-posts to the Fediverse this year. That's because next to nobody on Mastodon knows that Friendica has been able to quote-post practically everything in the Fediverse, including Mastodon toots, for 15 years now.
And if Friendica doesn't have it, chances are still that Hubzilla has it, and that Hubzilla has probably had it for longer than Mastodon has been around, too.
For example, private messages that are actually private. Mastodon doesn't have them because the "privacy" of Mastodon DMs is only "guaranteed" by limiting whom a DM is sent to. Hubzilla does have them and has had them since 2012, since it was still named Red. How Because Hubzilla also limits who is permitted to see a DM.
Oh, and Hubzilla even offers optional encryption on top of that.
Or how about server-independent identity Everyone still waiting for Bluesky to finally be the pioneer who invents this and implements it for the first time LOL! Once again, Hubzilla has had this since 2012. Not a vague concept, not an unstable proof-of-concept, but daily-driven by production-grade channels on production-grade servers. (streams) has it, too, inherited from Hubzilla through a whole number of forks. Forte has it, too, and Forte is the first and, so far, only Fediverse server software that uses ActivityPub for nomadic identity.
Now I'm waiting for someone to announce that something will "bring" actual groups "to the Fediverse". A feature that was actually introduced to the Fediverse by StatusNet in 2008, and that's also available on Friendica, Hubzilla, (streams) and Forte. Not to mention that the very principle of the Threadiverse (Lemmy, the remains of /kbin, Mbin, PieFed) is based on groups.
This is what happens when you think that the feature set of the whole Fediverse is the feature set of Mastodon and maybe Pixelfed because that's all you know.
Speaking of Mastodon: Just because it's being "brought to the Fediverse", doesn't mean it'll be adopted by Mastodon.
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # But this will take a lot of time. A whole lot of time.
The situation right now is still that Mastodon has considerably more users than the whole rest of the Fediverse combined. Within Mastodon itself, well over 90% of all messages are from Mastodon.
The majority of Mastodon users think the Fediverse equals Mastodon. The majority of the rest think the Fediverse equals Mastodon with PeerTube and Pixelfed and the like glued onto it as add-ons. The majority of those remaining cannot imagine for the lives of them that you can follow Friendica accounts from Mastodon because you can't follow Facebook accounts from either.
Apart from Reddit-to-Lemmy refugees, every single last Fediverse newbie enters the Fediverse via Mastodon without being told that the Fediverse is more than just Mastodon. In fact, many don't even learn about the Fediverse itself, only that there's a phone app named Mastodon that's allegedly "literally without Musk".
Remember the early days of smartphones When 99% of all commercial apps were only developed for iOS because developing for Android wasn't worth it, because Android was "too small"
You know when this changed This didn't change when Android had gained a significant market share. This din't even change when Android had a market share of over 50%. This only changed when the Samsung Galaxy S, one specific Android phone model, had been outselling the iPhone for long enough for market analysts to notice.
In Fediverse terms, this means it isn't sufficient for the non-Mastodon Fediverse as a whole to outgrow Mastodon in numbers of users or in content. Even if most content seen on Mastodon doesn't originate on Mastodon anymore, that wouldn't be sufficient to break Mastodon's dominance.
It's sad to say, but we need one Fediverse server application to outgrow Mastodon in users and activity. Ideally, that'd be a server application that's both standards-compliant and state-of-the-art in technology and blistering with technology that goes beyond Mastodon's wildest imagination.
In other words, what we need is to channel a Facebook exodus of several tens of millions of users to Forte. I'd say hundreds of millions to also outgrow Threads, but Threads will block every last Forte server because Forte is incompatible with Forte's federation requirements by its design and its philosophy.
Imagine a Fediverse in which, whenever one Mastodon user speaks of Mastodon as either "the Fediverse" or the best Fediverse software ever, two or three Forte users disagree.
Trouble is, Forte isn't fit to take a Facebook exodus infrastructure-wise. It doesn't have a single public, open-registration server. It probably has fewer than 20 daily-driving users, all of whom are on single-user servers.
This also means that nobody knows whether Forte is fit to take a Facebook exodus technology-wise. Nobody knows how many users a Forte server can handle if none has ever even had half a dozen users. And, in fact, nobody knows how well Forte's implementation of nomadic identity works if only Mike Macgirvin himself has evern cloned a Forte channel and even that only under lab conditions. I mean, why clone your channel when you can just as well back up the whole server because it's yours
(streams) doesn't look much better, unfortunately. It has about two public, open-registration servers. There should be another one in Europe, but it's currently broken. Otherwise, it's like Forte: People try it by first setting up their own server. And hardly anyone is willing to host a public one, much less enough of these for cloning to be viable. So, again, even (streams)' nomadic identity is only ever tested by Mike under lab conditions.
It doesn't help that both have only one developer who is officially retired.
As much as I personally love (streams) for being sleek and more fitting into today's Fediverse, it's probably Hubzilla that's the most solid candidate for a state-of-the-art Facebook alternative.
It's the most well-known of the bunch (except non-nomadic, account-equals-identity Friendica). It has been around for a decade. It has two main devs, none of whom have ever retired from Fediverse development. It has quite a bunch of open-registration hubs. It has enough active users for bugs to be spotted quickly and even a few who occasionally submit pull requests. It has an active community, albeit a small one, but better than having only a few dozen users world-wide. I've even read somewhere that Hubzilla needs fewer server resources than (streams). And yes, it's more versatile. Also, it has a community-maintained help system where (streams) and Forte barely have a public tech spec.
On the other hand, however, Hubzilla has the steepest learning curve in the whole Fediverse. It feels like geared towards Friendica converts first and foremost, although Friendica and Hubzilla have been developed away from each other.
Its default settings are still adjusted for a Zot-based "Grid" that was envisioned as a successor to the Federation in the first half of the 2010s, but not for today's ActivityPub-based Fediverse. This means that you will have to configure your brand-new channel before you can start using it. And there's nothing on Hubzilla's Web UI that tells you that you have to "install" an "app" to be able to connect to Mastodon. Not to mention that many permission settings are only available in the shape of templates rather than individual switches like on (streams) and Forte.
It's hard enough for Mastodon users who are already used to decentralised things to switch to Hubzilla, the difference in philosophy (Twitter clone vs grand-son of a Facebook alternative with a side of WordPress) notwithstanding. But it'd be considerably harder for Facebook users to switch to Hubzilla than it is for users to switch to Mastodon.
I can't see Hubzilla dominate the Fediverse for other reasons as well, even in the event of a huge Facebook exodus.
First of all, the vast majority of Facebook refugees will be on-boarded by people who barely or not at all know the Fediverse beyond Mastodon, and who therefore think that Mastodon is the Fediverse's only viable alternative to Facebook. And by people who may know that Friendica exists, but who want to stay in contact with their old Facebook friends, and who cannot imagine that you can follow a Friendica account from Mastodon. So these Facebook refugees will end up adding millions upon millions of new users to Mastodon.
Besides, the Friendica community will try to reel in as many Facebook refugees as possible. The Friendica community is bigger than the Hubzilla community. Also, they've probably got some considerable foothold on Facebook whereas your typical Hubzilla user is hardly anywhere else except maybe for an experimental (streams) channel. Friendica will use its advantage of being widely considered "the" Facebook alternative in the Fediverse.
At the same time, the Hubzilla community won't even know how to tackle this situation, much less profit from it. They'll probably get stuck in discussions that don't lead to anything productive, in this case also being hindered by the notion that "Hubzilla is not a social network" (even though it'd work just fine as one).
Lastly, people will join whatever has its own official app in the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store with the same name as the whole project and the server software. And that's Mastodon.
In the meantime, Friendica only has a bunch of third-party Android apps and a few semi-open beta iOS apps, but no official one named "Friendica". The other three have no apps at all, save for a Web-based Hubzilla app that hasn't seen any development activity in over six years. And the Hubzilla community can't even agree upon whether any Hubzilla app would be feasible in the first place, much less which features it has to include, also due to the false assumption that people will use the app only occasionally when they're out and about rather than daily-drive it as their only frontend.
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
That's a pretty major UX fail right there.
Any progress on finalising an FEP for using nomadic identity with AP

I think it'll take more than that one FEP (FEP-ef61 Portable Objects) to do that. I expect to whip up more FEPs in the on-going process of turning Mitra from something like most Fediverse software (non-nomadic, account equals identity) into something that's every bit as nomadic as Forte.
Thing is, Mitra still has a long way to go, also because it aims to have an implementation of nomadic identity that's entirely covered by FEPs. Forte has nomadic identity via ActivityPub, but that's technology adopted from Zot/Nomad that needed to be made to work first and foremost with no regards for FEPs.
Besides, the existence of FEPs doesn't matter as long as Mastodon refuses to adopt them. And Mastodon has already silently rejected client-side support for OpenWebAuth magic sign-on by refusing to merge an existing, ready-to-merge pull request that would have implemented it immediately.
This means we'll probably never even see Mastodon become capable of recognising nomadic channels. And I'm not talking about Mastodon going nomadic itself (which, by the way, would also give Mastodon the easy account moving that its users have been craving for for so long).
# # # # # # # # # # # # # Teilweise ja, aber selbst du auf Mastodon kannst sehen: Da ist der Text formatiert. Oder da ist eine Stichpunktliste. Oder da ist ein Link eingebettet (wobei ich glaube, 95% der Mastodon-Nutzer nehmen eingebettete Links berhaupt nicht wahr, weil sie sich nicht vorstellen knnen, da Links ohne sichtbare URLs im Fediverse berhaupt mglich sein, weil die eben in Mastodon-Trts nicht mglich sind).
Und daraus sollte dann sofort ersichtlich sein: Dieser "Trt" ist kein "Trt", weil er nicht von Mastodon ist. Weil er nicht von Mastodon kommen kann. Weil Mastodon das, was in dem "Trt" drin ist, gar nicht erzeugen kann. Und da, wo man solche Sachen erzeugen kann, "trtet" man nicht, weil das eben nicht Mastodon ist.
Oder wenn die Erwhnungen "komisch" aussehen, dann wei man auch: Das kann so unmglich von Mastodon kommen. Sowas macht Mastodon nicht. Mastodon erwhnt so nicht.
Da braucht es nicht wie auf *key oder Friendica oder (streams) oder Forte eine Angabe ganz oben, wo genau ein Beitrag herkommt, um zu sehen, da der nicht von Mastodon ist.
Woher genau der ist, ist erstmal nachrangig. Wichtig ist erstmal nur, da er nicht von Mastodon kommt. Dann hrt man als Mastodon-Nutzer vielleicht auch mal auf

Also genau die Sachen, wo reine Mastodon-Nutzer sagen: "h, das passiert Hab ich noch nie gesehen." oder "Ist doch scheiegal, oder", die aber die Nicht-Mastodon-Nutzer wie zur Weiglut bringen.
Insofern geht es sehr wohl darum, wo jemand "eine Nachricht schreibt".
CC:
# # # # # # # # # # # # #

Tauranga City Council confirms grant for 50m Mount Maunganui College pool

He ended up moving from Tauranga to Auckland as there were better facilities and more training buddies. The

Groups are tied permanently to the originating server.

Not true for Hubzilla forums as well as (streams) and Forte groups.
I could set up a Hubzilla forum channel that simultaneously resides on half a dozen or more fully independent servers. All instances of the channel will incrementally back themselves up to all other instances of the channel in near-real-time, bidirectionally.
One server goes down, I still have 100% identical living copies on all the other servers.
The miracle of . Established in 2012, daily-driven on production channels for longer than Mastodon itself.
Literally the only disadvantage is that the non-nomadic parts of the Fediverse, including Mastodon, will perceive each clone as its own separate Fediverse account.
# # # # # # # # # # # # # Na ja, an ein paar Dingen kann man schon sofort erkennen, da ein Beitrag so nicht von Mastodon selbst kommen kann.
Beispiel: Fett Kursiv Unterstrichen Code
Zitat

Kann Mastodon alles nicht erzeugen. Wenn sowas da ist, kann der ganze Beitrag nicht von Mastodon sein.
Anderes Beispiel: Erwhnungen. Mastodon und seine Forks erwhnen
Also .
Misskey und seine Forks (und Forks von Forks usw.) erwhnen
Also .
Friendica und Hubzilla erwhnen
Also .
(streams) und Forte erwhnen standardmig wie Friendica und Hubzilla, knnen aber optional mit Kurznamen erwhnen, wobei auch dann das nicht im Link ist.
Mit Hashtags ist es hnlich: Auf Friendica, Hubzilla, (streams) und Forte ist das # kein Teil des Link, sondern es steht vor dem Link. brigens knnen die vier auch sehr viel mehr Zeichen im Hashtag haben, sogar Leerzeichen.
Wenn jemand in einem Bildpost erwhnt, da man von dem Post das Original ffnen sollte, um alle Bilder zu sehen, weil er mehr als vier Bilder enthlt, kann der Post auch nicht von Mastodon sein.
Antworten, die nicht jeden vorherigen Poster erwhnen Sowas kann nur von Friendica und seiner Familie oder aus dem Threadiverse (Lemmy, /kbin, Mbin, PieFed) kommen, wo Antworten keine Erwhnungen brauchen.
Es gibt noch ein untrgliches Zeichen, da ein Beitrag nicht von Mastodon kommen kann. Und das ist, wenn sich darin jemand darber aufregt, da mal wieder das Fediverse mit Mastodon gleichgesetzt wird. Beinahe allen Mastodon-Nutzern ist das komplett Wurscht, oder sie glauben selbst, das Fediverse sei nur Mastodon.
Auch Leute, die sich darber aufregen, wenn jemand einen langen Beitrag in lauter kleine Stcke zerschnippelt, gibt es so nicht auf Mastodon. Generell: Wenn jemand ber irgendetwas motzt, was auf Mastodon vllig normal oder gar Pflicht oder sogar technisch zwingend notwendig ist, dann kommt das definitiv nicht von Mastodon.
CC:
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Tja, ist gar nicht auf Mastodon. Nur weil du es auf Mastodon siehst, mu es nicht selbst auf Mastodon sein.
Ein Irrglaube nicht nur von so ziemlich ausnahmslos jedem Mastodon-Neuling, sondern auch von vielen, die schon seit Jahren dabei sind, ist, da das Fediverse nur Mastodon ist. Das stimmt nicht das Fediverse war nie nur Mastodon. Nie.
Wenn man dann lernt, da das Fediverse nicht nur Mastodon ist, ist es hufig trotzdem unvorstellbar, da die ganzen Serveranwendungen im Fediverse nicht nur innerhalb ihrer selbst, sondern auch untereinander kommunizieren. Auch das bestrkt den Irrglauben vieler Mastodon-Nutzer, alles, was sie in ihren Timelines sehen, ist selbst auch von Mastodon.
war lange auf Calckey und ist inzwischen auf Sharkey. Calckey und Sharkey sind beide Forks von Misskey, einer in Japan entwickelten "Microblogging"-Serveranwendung im Fediverse. Und Misskey wird seit 2014 unabhngig von Mastodon entwickelt.
Ich selbst schreibe hier gerade von Hubzilla (, ). Eigentlich sollte offensichtlich sein, da das hier nicht von Mastodon kommen kann, weil es Sachen beinhaltet, die Mastodon nicht kann, z. B.:

Hubzillas Geschichte geht zurck bis nach Friendica, das 2010 vom selben ursprnglichen Entwickler an den Start gebracht wurde, also fnfeinhalb Jahre vor Mastodon, als Eugen Rochko noch zur Schule ging. Besagter Entwickler hat es 2011 zweimal geforkt und dann 2012 und 2015 jeweils grndlich umgebaut. So entstand Hubzilla, die mit Abstand mchtigste Fediverse-Serveranwendung und das genaue Gegenteil von Mastodon. Du kannst es dir vorstellen als Facebook trifft WordPress trifft GeoCities trifft Google Cloud Services trifft noch einiges mehr an Zeugs. Sachen, die fr Mastodon vllig unvorstellbar sind, kann es schon lnger, als es Mastodon berhaupt gibt. Mit Mastodon kommunizieren kann es trotzdem.
tldr: Im Fediverse gibt es Sachen, die sehr viel mchtiger sind als Mastodon. Und es gibt sie schon lnger als Mastodon selbst. Mit Mastodon fing im Fediverse gar nichts an, hchstens die als selbstverstndlich und gottgegeben angesehene Mastodon-Zentrizitt und der Glaube, das Fediverse sei nur Mastodon.

# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

1973 Vintage Magazine Cover - Nostalgic Fashion and Style

The image is a vintage magazine cover featuring two individuals in close proximity, with one partially obscuring the other. The person on the left wears a brown suede coat or jacket adorned with what appears to be fur detailing around the collar area. Their hair seems dark and possibly styled loosely.

On the right side of the photo, there's another individual who has their hand resting under their chin in a thoughtful pose, wearing a long-sleeved sweater that matches the color scheme of the brown coat on the left. The lighting is soft, with some highlights reflecting off what could be strands of hair or surface texture.

The overall aesthetic suggests a fashion spread from decades past, capturing a moment between two people dressed in warm clothing suitable for cooler weather. This image may evoke feelings associated with nostalgia and style trends of earlier times.

No discernible text is present within the visible portion of this cover.
Tags: vintage, magazine cover, brown suede coat, fur detailing, thoughtful pose, long-sleeved sweater

-sleevedsweater

Driver flees after collision in LongBranch

Toronto police say a male has been taken to a hospital after he was involved in a two-vehicle collision on Tuesday night. The incident occurred in the Lake Shore Boulevard West and Forty First Street area just after 8:45 p.m., according to police. Investigators say one of the drivers fled on foot. Meanwhile the male in his 20s was transported to a hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. ,

No, but neither are the authors of these 5 references that I've listed on the page I've linked to. They all say that "Photo of" does not belong into alt-text. One of them is even on Mastodon.
by




# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Actually, if you're posting a digital photograph of something, do not say so!
Any other kind of medium: yes. Digital photo: no.
It simply is redundant and uses up space and screen reader time. Digital photos have become so ubiquitous that any image that isn't explicitly described as something else can and has to be assumed to be a digital photo.
Related page from my alt-text/image description wiki:
# # # # # # # # # # #

I come down the stairs at the 44th entrance and these young women are dancing in place. Shake it! I say, Shake it like you mean it! and they clutch each other, laughing.
But my card is empty and we become grownup New Yorkers, using neighboring OMNI machines. Once my card is full, and I realize their music is still softly playing, I dance a bit as I retrieve my card. I Love New York.
.
is

De Nieuwe Podcast "Bij ons aan de keukentafel" staat online! - S1A5

Kwetsbaar Eerlijk & Openhartig

Covid

By: MorpurgoMedia.nl

A night alone with the Universe by Vagelis Pikoulas

#1435 #2025

Long

Russian oil rig in Caspian Sea halts production after Ukrainian drone strike

Ukraines Security Service (SBU) struck Russias Vladimir field in the for the first time with -range , halting and production from more than 20 , a source in the said on Dec. 11

I've only used AI for image descriptions twice. It was LLaVA. And that was not for actual productive use, but to pit it directly against my own hand-written descriptions. I had described the images myself before I let the AI loose on it.
In my opinion, the results were abysmal. But that was to be expected.
Granted, I had unfair advantages. For one, the images showed something so extremely obscure that the AI barely had an idea of what it was looking at I did. Besides, the AI had to describe the image by looking at the image at its very limited resolution. I could describe the image by looking at the original at a near-infinite resolution. This is also why the AI didn't even transcribe one bit of text in the image, and I transcribed them all.
# # # # # # # # # # #

It is quite true that women like courage, and that boldness often goes a long way but it is questionable whether with high-bred natures a subdued, quiet, and delicate manner does not go still further.
Richard Jefferies

How unfinished is Iceshrimp.NET This unfinished:
Iceshrimp.NET appears to have no support for conversations. At all. I'm not just saying it has no support for enclosed conversations like on Friendica, Hubzilla, (streams), Forte, Facebook and every last blog out there, not to mention FEP-171b "Conversation Containers".
I'm saying it has no concept of threads. It has no concept whatsoever of a message having a parent or children in a thread.
All it seems to know is stand-alone messages. Iceshrimp.NET only shows you single messages, and it gives you no way at all to access even only what these messages reply to. This is even worse than Mastodon, and that has to say something.
Also, Iceshrimp.NET seems to use some exotic, home-brew message format that must have little to do with the W3C ActivityPub standard, even taking FEPs into consideration. It's impossible to use Hubzilla's search to import an Iceshrimp.NET message onto your stream.
And: redirects to the Iceshrimp.NET code repository. Which, in turn, contains a link to an iceshrimp.net website at the top. Another to-do that isn't even on any to-do list. Yeah, I know that and have no websites either, but Mike doesn't pretend they have websites, and especially (streams) has very good reasons not to have an official website.
Let's just hope that it has overcome the *key-inherent federation issues by having been rewritten.
# # # # # # # # # #How unfinished is Iceshrimp.NET This unfinished:
Iceshrimp.NET appears to have no support for conversations. At all. I'm not just saying it has no support for enclosed conversations like on Friendica, Hubzilla, (streams), Forte, Facebook and every last blog out there, not to mention FEP-171b "Conversation Containers".
I'm saying it has no concept of threads. It has no concept whatsoever of a message having a parent or children in a thread.
All it seems to know is stand-alone messages. Iceshrimp.NET only shows you single messages, and it gives you no way at all to access even only what these messages reply to. This is even worse than Mastodon, and that has to say something.
Also, Iceshrimp.NET seems to use some exotic, home-brew message format that must have little to do with the W3C ActivityPub standard, even taking FEPs into consideration. It's impossible to use Hubzilla's search to import an Iceshrimp.NET message onto your stream.
And: redirects to the Iceshrimp.NET code repository. Which, in turn, contains a link to an iceshrimp.net website at the top. Another to-do that isn't even on any to-do list. Yeah, I know that and have no websites either, but Mike doesn't pretend they have websites, and especially (streams) has very good reasons not to have an official website.
Let's just hope that it has overcome the *key-inherent federation issues by having been rewritten.
# # # # # # # # # #

et affirment que leur analyse de la vido, des tmoignages et des preuves balistiques dmontre que les frres , 40 ans, et , 35 ans, taient dsarms et ne reprsentaient aucune menace.

Tongue

You will still lose lots of reach.
People won't see your image posts because they have technical means of hiding or completely removing any and all posts with images without alt-text from all their timelines.
People will block you upon first strike when finding one of your image posts without an alt-text.
Followers will unfollow you.
You will be lectured. You will be scolded. You will be verbally attacked. You will be called an ableist swine. Even more so if you try to defend yourself.
If you want at least some reach on Mastodon, and if you want to be left in peace, your only choice is to add a hand-written, non-AI-generated, accurate, sufficiently detailed alt-text to every single last image that you will ever post. Immediately when posting it.
CC:
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
Ive gotten to where I wont post anything anywhere without alt text in the photos.

Same here, only that I won't just simply add some alt-text. Rather, I go all the way and add what someone may need described and/or explained.
When I post a meme, this means a roughly standard-sized alt-text with a short visual description and transcripts of the relevant bits of text plus explanation in the post itself.
When I post an original image which is always a 3-D virtual world rendering, the image description in the alt-text is much longer. And in addition, there is an even longer long image description in the post itself that contains what I can't fit into the alt-text plus even more explanations than for my meme posts.
I never know who might see it and I want people to enjoy what I post.

On top of that, I want people to understand what I post. I don't want anyone to have to ask me for explanations in order to understand my images. I don't want anyone to have to look anything up themselves. Because my experience is that having to ask or having to look something up is not accessible.
But I only ever post about super-obscure niche topics. That's either super-obscure 3-D virtual worlds that nobody knows anything about. Or it's memes about the Fediverse which usually means the Fediverse beyond Mastodon which, again, hardly anyone on Mastodon knows a thing about.
In addition, when I post a virtual world rendering, I have to assume that people who can't see the image don't know what anything in the image looks like. I mean, they've certainly never seen a single image from within one of these worlds, right Still, they might be super curious about anything and everything in the image.
And so I have to write the longest image descriptions the Fediverse has ever seen. This doesn't take only a few minutes. It takes hours if I'm lucky and days if not.
was two months ago. It was also the only image I've posted this year.
was almost a year and a half ago. And its descriptions are actually fairly short. I've done even longer ones in the past. But the images were intentionally kept simple with little to describe and explain.
was last year, too.
(All three links lead to Fediverse posts. They don't take you to Mastodon toots. These are posts on which is part of the Fediverse, too, and federated with Mastodon. And all these posts have very much reached Mastodon timelines.)
CC:
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

MS-13 and Trump Backed the Same Honduras Presidential Candidate

Gangsters from MS-13, a Trump-designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, intimidated Hondurans not to vote for the left-leaning presidential candidate,
:ArticlePost :Tuesday :English :Article :Factiva :SmartNews :SocialFlow :Politics :World :23.00 :2000-2999

Artist: Rameses B
Title: been a long time
Genre: Unknown
Deezer: YouTube: SoundCloud:

Selon , aurait fourni des renseignements sensibles sur les activits de laxe de la rsistance, comprenant et ses allis en .

:-)

Sydney sisters with ultra-rare condition dream of first summer safely outdoors

Its sad and confronting, their mother Yvette Walker told news.com.au during an emotional interview. No amount of UV


Last updated: 2025-12-26






online degrees